details
Title |
Empirisch-vergleichende Forschung. Konzeptionelle Probleme und politischer Nutzen |
---|---|
Author | Bos, Wilfried |
Source | Tertium comparationis 5 (1999) 2, S. 118-133 |
Document | full text (586 KB) |
License of the document | In copyright |
Keywords (German) | Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft; Empirische Forschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Vergleichende Forschung; Vergleichsuntersuchung; Metatheorie; Praxis; Theorie |
sub-discipline | Empirical Educational Research |
Document type | Article (journal) |
ISSN | 0947-9732; 09479732 |
Language | German |
Year of creation | 1999 |
review status | Peer-Reviewed |
Abstract (English): | In this article the relation of practice, theory and metatheory is discussed for comparative education. Subsequently examples of quantitatively orientated empirical research methods is revealed for national studies as well as for the transcultural testing of theories. However, the author constantly points out that empirical educational research in the scope of comparative education does not replace historical hermeneutic research but to complement it. (DIPF/Orig.) |
other articles of this journal | Tertium comparationis Jahr: 1999 |
Statistics | Number of document requests |
Checksums | checksum comparison as proof of integrity |
Date of publication | 16.12.2011 |
Citation | Bos, Wilfried: Empirisch-vergleichende Forschung. Konzeptionelle Probleme und politischer Nutzen - In: Tertium comparationis 5 (1999) 2, S. 118-133 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-29423 - DOI: 10.25656/01:2942 |