Suche

Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Detailanzeige

Originaltitel
Equality of opportunity and equality of outcome
ParalleltitelEnakost moznosti in enakost rezultatov
Autor
OriginalveröffentlichungCEPS Journal 6 (2016) 2, S. 9-24
Dokument  (235 KB)
Lizenz des Dokumentes Lizenz-Logo 
Schlagwörter (Deutsch)
Teildisziplin
DokumentartAufsatz (Zeitschrift)
ISSN2232-2647; 22322647
SpracheEnglisch
Erscheinungsjahr
BegutachtungsstatusPeer-Review
Abstract (Englisch):The report on the findings of extensive empirical research on equality of educational opportunities carried out in the US on a very large sample of public schools by Coleman and his colleagues has had a major impact on education policy and has given rise to a large amount of research and various interpretations. However, as some interpreters have highlighted, even more important than the findings of the survey themselves has been Coleman’s redefinition of equality of opportunity, abandoning the then prevailing conception of equality of educational opportunities as equality of starting points and replacing it with the concept of equality of educational opportunities as equality of educational outcomes. The question is, therefore, whether equality of outcomes really is one of the two types of equality of opportunity. The purpose of the present article is to show that equality of opportunity and equality of outcomes are two different types of equality. If they are different, the interpretation that Coleman has redefined the concept of “equality of educational opportunity” turns out to be incorrect. (DIPF/Orig.)
weitere Beiträge dieser Zeitschrift
Statistik
Prüfsummen
Eintrag erfolgte am11.07.2016
QuellenangabeKodelja, Zdenko: Equality of opportunity and equality of outcome - In: CEPS Journal 6 (2016) 2, S. 9-24 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-122918 - DOI: 10.25656/01:12291
Dateien exportieren

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen