details
Article (journal) accessible via
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-207591
DOI: 10.25656/01:20759; 10.26529/cepsj.483
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-207591
DOI: 10.25656/01:20759; 10.26529/cepsj.483
Original Title |
Between retributive and restorative compulsory school teachers’ discipline activities |
---|---|
Parallel title | Med retributivno in restorativno naravnanimi vzgojno-disciplinskimi odzivi uciteljev v osnovni soli |
Authors | Jeznik, Katja; Kroflic, Robi; Kuhar, Metka |
Source | CEPS Journal 10 (2020) 2, S. 101-121 |
Document | full text (271 KB) |
License of the document | In copyright |
Keywords (German) | Pflichtschule; Schulpflicht; Schulverweigerung; Schulversäumnis; Disziplinarmaßnahme; Verfahren; Bewertung; Lehrer; Einstellung <Psy>; Vignette <Methode>; Gruppendiskussion; Slowenien |
sub-discipline | Curriculum and Teaching / School Pedagogy |
Document type | Article (journal) |
ISSN | 2232-2647; 22322647 |
Language | English |
Year of creation | 2020 |
review status | Peer-Reviewed |
Abstract (English): | In Slovenia, compulsory schools have, since 2009, been obliged to define their own concept of moral and character education under the formal framework of the Primary School Act. Disciplinary measures in schools are underpinned by two main punishment theories: the more traditional retributive responses to undesired conduct, and the more recent restorative approach. The present study explores the views of 109 teachers from 13 compulsory schools regarding disciplinary measures through the prism of this paradigmatic divide. A qualitative analysis of group discussions in which teachers evaluated the disciplinary measures at each of the 13 schools will be presented. Only three discussion groups were predominantly restorative oriented. Given the proven negative effects of retribution-oriented disciplinary measures, the findings are not encouraging. We conclude that schools need a clearer disciplinary framework with systematic acquisition of knowledge and practical experience in the field of educational and discipline strategies, and that teachers must continuously reflect on their own disciplinary practices. (DIPF/Orig.) |
other articles of this journal | CEPS Journal Jahr: 2020 |
Statistics | Number of document requests |
Checksums | checksum comparison as proof of integrity |
Date of publication | 05.10.2020 |
Citation | Jeznik, Katja; Kroflic, Robi; Kuhar, Metka: Between retributive and restorative compulsory school teachers’ discipline activities - In: CEPS Journal 10 (2020) 2, S. 101-121 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-207591 - DOI: 10.25656/01:20759; 10.26529/cepsj.483 |