search

Advanced Search

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

details

Title
Universalization or localization? Issues of knowledge legitimation in comaprative education
Author
SourceTertium comparationis 4 (1998) 1, S. 1-9 ZDB
Document  (176 KB)
License of the document In copyright
Keywords (German)
sub-discipline
Document typeArticle (journal)
ISSN0947-9732; 1434-1697; 09479732; 14341697
LanguageEnglish
Year of creation
review statusPeer-Reviewed
Abstract (English):The endeavor to unite the universal and the accidental in both, the physical and the social world into one theoretical framework – the idea of such a unity can be found already in the Chinese concept of Tao – dates back in the modern culture to the Enlightenment. Such a unified knowledge came to be understood as a potential tool of forecasting and controlling societal progress. All through the positivistic 19th century, comparativists followed Marc-Antoine Jullien de Paris, who thought educational comparison should become an exact science whose outcomes could be used anywhere and transplanted to any place. It was Michael Sadler who as the first comparative educationalist strictly refused the idea of cultural and institutional borrowing. Under his influence comparative education focused on the variations unique to the single countries and to the factors underlying these variations. Even the later emerging functionalist method remained in the tradition of a „one-dimensional logic“, which, as Marcuse alleged, was inseparably connected with the rationale of domination of nature and society. It is only the postmodern sight, which – without giving up the humanistic ideas of modernity which originated in Western modernization – opens possibilities to enter a cross cultural dialogue and to accept multiple theoretical realities. (DIPF/Orig.)
Abstract (German):Der Beitrag bietet einen breiten Überblick über grundlegende Tendenzen in der historischen Entwicklung von Vergleichender Erziehungswissenschaft. Dabei unterliegt der Darstellung implizit und explizit durchgängig das Bewußtsein, daß vergleichende Wissenschaft im weitesten Sinne weder ein Monopol der jüngsten Epoche noch etwa eines einzigen Kulturraums darstellt. Mit seiner analytischen, aber auch normativen Interpretation von gegenwärtigen Tendenzen postmodernen Denkens sieht er die Möglichkeit eines transkulturellen Dialogs über die Weiterentwicklung und Erweiterung der etablierten (westlichen) Vergleichenden (Erziehungs-)Wissenschaft. (DIPF/Orig.)
other articles of this journal
Statistics
Checksums
Date of publication17.11.2010
CitationYang, Shen-Keng: Universalization or localization? Issues of knowledge legitimation in comaprative education - In: Tertium comparationis 4 (1998) 1, S. 1-9 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-28811 - DOI: 10.25656/01:2881
export files

share content at social platforms