Suche

Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Detailanzeige

Titel
Education, fair competition, and concern for the worst off
Autor
OriginalveröffentlichungEducational theory 61 (2011) 1, S. 41-54 ZDB
Dokument  (286 KB) (formal überarbeitete Version)
Lizenz des Dokumentes Deutsches Urheberrecht
Schlagwörter (Deutsch)
Teildisziplin
DokumentartAufsatz (Zeitschrift)
ISSN0013-2004; 1741-5446; 00132004; 17415446
SpracheEnglisch
Erscheinungsjahr
BegutachtungsstatusPeer-Review
Abstract (Englisch):In this essay, [the author] comments on the current philosophical debate on educational justice. He observes that while authors like Elizabeth Anderson and Debra Satz develop a so-called adequacy view of educational justice, Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift defend an egalitarian principle. Giesinger focuses his analysis on the main objection that is formulated, from an egalitarian perspective, against the adequacy view: that it neglects the problem of securing fair opportunities in the competition for social rewards. [The author] meets this objection by expressing two basic theses: First, he argues that Brighouse and Swift themselves fail to give an adequate account of fair competition; and, second, he shows that the adequacy view provides the theoretical resources to face this problem. (Orig.)
Statistik
Prüfsummen
Eintrag erfolgte am24.01.2012
QuellenangabeGiesinger, Johannes: Education, fair competition, and concern for the worst off - In: Educational theory 61 (2011) 1, S. 41-54 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-52554 - DOI: 10.25656/01:5255
Dateien exportieren

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen