Advanced Search

Ariadne Pfad:



Article (journal) accessible at
Education, fair competition, and concern for the worst off
SourceEducational theory 61 (2011) 1, S. 41-54 ZDB
Document (formally revised edition)
Keywords (German)Bildung; Chancengleichheit; Privatschule; Gerechtigkeit; Gleichheit; Finanzierung; Angemessenheit; Demokratie
sub-disciplineGeneral Educational Science
Document typeArticle (journal)
ISSN0013-2004; 1741-5446
Year of creation
review statusPeer-Reviewed
Abstract (English):In this essay, [the author] comments on the current philosophical debate on educational justice. He observes that while authors like Elizabeth Anderson and Debra Satz develop a so-called adequacy view of educational justice, Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift defend an egalitarian principle. Giesinger focuses his analysis on the main objection that is formulated, from an egalitarian perspective, against the adequacy view: that it neglects the problem of securing fair opportunities in the competition for social rewards. [The author] meets this objection by expressing two basic theses: First, he argues that Brighouse and Swift themselves fail to give an adequate account of fair competition; and, second, he shows that the adequacy view provides the theoretical resources to face this problem. (Orig.)
Statistics Number of document requests
Checksumschecksum comparison as proof of integrity
Date of publication24.01.2012
Suggested CitationGiesinger, Johannes: Education, fair competition, and concern for the worst off - In: Educational theory 61 (2011) 1, S. 41-54 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-52554
export files

share content at social platforms (only available with Javascript turned on)