Detailanzeige
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift) zugänglich unter
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230832
DOI: 10.25656/01:23083; 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.7
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230832
DOI: 10.25656/01:23083; 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.7
| Titel |
Beyond ambiguity and ambivalence. Rethinking the tools of critique |
|---|---|
| Autor | Anker, Elisabeth S. |
| Originalveröffentlichung | on education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 7 S.  |
| gehört zu: | Reply. Notes on Post-critique |
| Reply. Undinge, coffee cup lids, and reinhabiting spaces. Some notes on a register of a (post-)critical philosophical life | |
| Reply. Against Latour - on the questionable foundations of post-critical pedagogy | |
| Dokument | Volltext (222 KB) |
| Lizenz des Dokumentes |
|
| Schlagwörter (Deutsch) | Bildung; Pädagogik; Philosophie; Politik; Geisteswissenschaften; Methodik; Ambiguität; Ambivalenz; Paradox; Kritik; Transformation; Vertrauen; Integrität; Klarheit |
| Teildisziplin | Bildungs- und Erziehungsphilosophie |
| Dokumentart | Aufsatz (Zeitschrift) |
| ISSN | 2571-7855; 25717855 |
| Sprache | Englisch |
| Erscheinungsjahr | 2020 |
| Begutachtungsstatus | (Verlags-)Lektorat |
| Abstract (Englisch): | This essay analyzes the central architecture of critique. It argues that, across the humanities, critique has followed a uniform methodology, wherein qualities like ambiguity, ambivalence, uncertainty, contradiction, and paradox have represented the main tools of not only critique and unmasking but also disclosure and transformation. Within teaching philosophy, critique has thus done more than to politicize the classroom; it has also ingrained an equation between pedagogy and therapeutic witnessing or confessionalism. For many, qualities like ambiguity and uncertainty have furthermore been imagined to bear distinctly 'ethical' fruits. This essay questions these staples of pedagogical theory, in particular the redemptive faith that paradox and contradiction will prove inherently critical and/or progressive. It therefore historicizes the architecture of critique, submitting that among other things the contemporary political climate challenges unbridled faith in those qualities. And it instead promotes values like trust, integrity, clarity, and noncontradiction as the goals of a postcritical education. (DIPF/Orig.) |
| weitere Beiträge dieser Zeitschrift | on education. Journal for research and debate Jahr: 2020 |
| Statistik |  Anzahl der Zugriffe auf dieses Dokument
|
| Prüfsummen | Prüfsummenvergleich als Unversehrtheitsnachweis |
| Eintrag erfolgte am | 14.05.2024 |
| Quellenangabe | Anker, Elisabeth S.: Beyond ambiguity and ambivalence. Rethinking the tools of critique - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 7 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230832 - DOI: 10.25656/01:23083; 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.7 |
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen
Teile diese Seite:
