Advanced Search

Ariadne Pfad:



Article (journal) accessible at
Dealing with cross-border higher education. Comparing the Chinese and the Indian ways
Authors ;
SourceTertium comparationis 12 (2006) 2, S. 145-163 ZDB
Keywords (German)Bildungsangebot; Bildungsmarkt; Akkreditierung; Internationalisierung; Rechtsgrundlage; Globalisierung; Hochschulpolitik; Hochschulrecht; Hochschulwesen; Internationaler Vergleich; GATS <General Agreement on Trade in Services>; Qualitätssicherung; Private Trägerschaft; China; Indien
sub-disciplineComparative Education
Organisation of Education, Educational Planning, Educational Legislation
Document typeArticle (journal)
Year of creation
review statusPeer-Reviewed
Abstract (English):Cross Border Higher Education (CBHE) is one of the issues of the present knowledge era. As knowledge transmission is becoming increasingly borderless, we understand that the forces of globalisation, neo-liberal principles and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are the three important driving factors for this development in cross-border education and higher education is the most affected area by this development. The huge higher education potentials of China and India have greatly attracted cross-border providers and in recent years there has been remarkable growth in the CBHE of these two countries. The accession of China and India to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the agreement on GATS allowed the free entry of for-profit cross-border educational providers both in and out. Both of these countries have encountered several problems in dealing with the CBHE. In response, they have taken some measures in recent years to regulate and manage CBHE. However, we understand that many things are not yet clear. We also became more curious recently to know how these two countries differ and resemble one another in dealing with CBHE. In this paper we would like to understand and compare the similarities and the differences in the ways that China and India organise and manage the CBHE. (DIPF/Orig.)
other articles of this journalTertium comparationis Jahr: 2006
StatisticsNumber of document requests Number of document requests
Checksumschecksum comparison as proof of integrity
Date of publication03.01.2012
Suggested CitationArulraj David, Solomon; Wildemeersch, Danny: Dealing with cross-border higher education. Comparing the Chinese and the Indian ways - In: Tertium comparationis 12 (2006) 2, S. 145-163 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-29725
export files

share content at social platforms (only available with Javascript turned on)