details
Article (journal) accessible via
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-299232
DOI: 10.25656/01:29923; 10.17899/on_ed.2021.12.2
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-299232
DOI: 10.25656/01:29923; 10.17899/on_ed.2021.12.2
| Title |
Rewilding technology |
|---|---|
| Author |
Macgilchrist, Felicitas   |
| Source | on education. Journal for research and debate 4 (2021) 12, 10 S.  |
| Document | full text (243 KB) |
| License of the document |
|
| Keywords (German) | Klima; Krise; Design; Digitale Medien; Bildung; Technologie; Nachhaltige Entwicklung |
| sub-discipline | Media Education Environmental Education |
| Document type | Article (journal) |
| ISSN | 2571-7855; 25717855 |
| Language | English |
| Year of creation | 2021 |
| review status | Publishing House Lectorship |
| Abstract (English): | This paper is rooted in the ecological crisis of our contemporary world. Rather than rejecting educational technology (edtech) as too environmentally damaging to use, it draws on critical utopian approaches, feminist science fiction and conservation projects to suggest 'rewilding' as a frame for designing and using edtech with a view to ameliorating technology’s long-term inequitable planetary impact. After briefly describing projects for rewilding nature, the paper turns to the specifics of rewilding edtech. It first highlights pragmatic suggestions for more sustainable edtech practices. It then suggests that the concept of 'sustainability' limits current practices, and proposes that a more radical and utopian rewilding can herald an education beyond sustainability. Rewilding edtech prioritises decelerating and degrowth, regenerating and relating, hospicing dying worlds and birthing new possibilities. (DIPF/Orig.) |
| other articles of this journal | on education. Journal for research and debate Jahr: 2021 |
| Statistics |  Number of document requests
|
| Checksums | checksum comparison as proof of integrity |
| Date of publication | 06.11.2025 |
| Citation | Macgilchrist, Felicitas: Rewilding technology - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 4 (2021) 12, 10 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-299232 - DOI: 10.25656/01:29923; 10.17899/on_ed.2021.12.2 |
share content at social platforms
Teile diese Seite:
