Suche

Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Detailanzeige

Titel
Reply. Against Latour - on the questionable foundations of post-critical pedagogy
Autoren
Originalveröffentlichungon education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 7 S. ZDB
gehört zu:Drawing distinctions. What is post-critical pedagogy?
Post-critique, politics, and the political in educational philosophy
'Post-critiquiness' as nonviolent thing-centredness
Beyond ambiguity and ambivalence. Rethinking the tools of critique
Dokument  (314 KB)
Lizenz des Dokumentes Lizenz-Logo 
Schlagwörter (Deutsch)
Teildisziplin
DokumentartAufsatz (Zeitschrift)
ISSN2571-7855; 25717855
SpracheEnglisch
Erscheinungsjahr
Begutachtungsstatus(Verlags-)Lektorat
Abstract (Englisch):Critique has run out of steam - this diagnosis by Bruno Latour is crucial for the "Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy" as well as for the on_education issue "The Fatigue of Critique?". With this essay, the author contradicts Latour's diagnosis. Latour's polemic against critique is based firstly on a questionable diagnosis of our time and secondly on a general and programmatic critique of sociology. Against that, the author brings out two main points. The first insight highlights that change is initially dependent on variations that can only arise from a negation of the existing. The second insight comes from the sociology of critique, which paradoxically sees success in the failure of critique. (DIPF/Orig.)
weitere Beiträge dieser Zeitschrift
Statistik
Prüfsummen
Eintrag erfolgte am15.05.2024
QuellenangabeHaker, Christoph; Otterspeer, Lukas: Reply. Against Latour - on the questionable foundations of post-critical pedagogy - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 7 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-298431 - DOI: 10.25656/01:29843
Dateien exportieren

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen