details
Article (journal) accessible via
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230266
DOI: 10.25656/01:23026; 10.17899/ON_ED.2018.2.9
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230266
DOI: 10.25656/01:23026; 10.17899/ON_ED.2018.2.9
Title |
Reply. Three arguments why post- and transhumanism need to be viewed from a long-term historical perspective. A commentary on issue No. 2 |
---|---|
Author |
Hof, Barbara E. ![]() ![]() |
Source | on education. Journal for research and debate 1 (2018) 2, 2 S. ![]() |
Document | full text (203 KB) |
License of the document |
|
Keywords (German) | Bildungstheorie; Historische Perspektive; Humanismus; Kommentar |
sub-discipline | General Educational Science Philosophy of Education |
Document type | Article (journal) |
ISSN | 2571-7855; 25717855 |
Language | English |
Year of creation | 2018 |
review status | Publishing House Lectorship |
other articles of this journal | on education. Journal for research and debate Jahr: 2018 |
Statistics | ![]() |
Checksums | checksum comparison as proof of integrity |
Date of publication | 01.09.2023 |
Citation | Hof, Barbara E.: Reply. Three arguments why post- and transhumanism need to be viewed from a long-term historical perspective. A commentary on issue No. 2 - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 1 (2018) 2, 2 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230266 - DOI: 10.25656/01:23026; 10.17899/ON_ED.2018.2.9 |