details
Article (journal) accessible via
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230266
DOI: 10.25656/01:23026; 10.17899/ON_ED.2018.2.9
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230266
DOI: 10.25656/01:23026; 10.17899/ON_ED.2018.2.9
| Title |
Reply. Three arguments why post- and transhumanism need to be viewed from a long-term historical perspective. A commentary on issue No. 2 |
|---|---|
| Author |
Hof, Barbara E. |
| Source | on education. Journal for research and debate 1 (2018) 2, 2 S. |
| Document | full text (203 KB) |
| License of the document |
|
| Keywords (German) | Bildungstheorie; Historische Perspektive; Humanismus; Kommentar |
| sub-discipline | General Educational Science Philosophy of Education |
| Document type | Article (journal) |
| ISSN | 2571-7855; 25717855 |
| Language | English |
| Year of creation | 2018 |
| review status | Publishing House Lectorship |
| other articles of this journal | on education. Journal for research and debate Jahr: 2018 |
| Statistics | |
| Checksums | checksum comparison as proof of integrity |
| Date of publication | 01.09.2023 |
| Citation | Hof, Barbara E.: Reply. Three arguments why post- and transhumanism need to be viewed from a long-term historical perspective. A commentary on issue No. 2 - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 1 (2018) 2, 2 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230266 - DOI: 10.25656/01:23026; 10.17899/ON_ED.2018.2.9 |