details
Article (journal) accessible via
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230896
DOI: 10.25656/01:23089; 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.13
URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230896
DOI: 10.25656/01:23089; 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.13
| Title |
Reply. Notes on Post-critique |
|---|---|
| Author |
Koh, Aaron   |
| Source | on education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 3 S.  |
| related to: | Drawing distinctions. What is post-critical pedagogy? |
| Resonance and education | |
| Earth-bound study as a post-critical response to the corona-crisis | |
| Beyond ambiguity and ambivalence. Rethinking the tools of critique | |
| Caring critique. Exploring pedagogical spheres between critical and post-critical approaches | |
| When a teacher's love for the world gets rejected. A post-critical invitation to become an edifying educator | |
| Document | full text (298 KB) |
| License of the document |
|
| Keywords (German) | Pädagogik; Kritik; Praxis; Methodik; Affirmation; Negativität; Autorität; These; Vorschlag; Antwort; Kommentar |
| sub-discipline | Philosophy of Education |
| Document type | Article (journal) |
| ISSN | 2571-7855; 25717855 |
| Language | English |
| Year of creation | 2020 |
| review status | Publishing House Lectorship |
| Abstract (English): | This essay argues that a useful grammar for doing post-critique has emerged from a trans-, inter- disciplinary dialogue on post-critique. The author further makes three propositions in the essay. First, he suggests that postcritique is an additive critical practice where resources for cultivating thinking, reasoning and evaluating draws on a constellation of approaches that combines this and that and reinvigorates critique in new directions. Second, postcritique repairs a 'negative' enterprise of critique that has become a culture of teaching in academia and schools. Third, more affirmative pedagogies of postcritique could be more welcoming and considered to be more constructive in authoritarian context. (DIPF/Orig.) |
| other articles of this journal | on education. Journal for research and debate Jahr: 2020 |
| Statistics |  Number of document requests
|
| Checksums | checksum comparison as proof of integrity |
| Date of publication | 15.05.2024 |
| Citation | Koh, Aaron: Reply. Notes on Post-critique - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 3 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-230896 - DOI: 10.25656/01:23089; 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.13 |
share content at social platforms
Teile diese Seite:
