search

Advanced Search

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

details

Title
Reply. Against Latour - on the questionable foundations of post-critical pedagogy
Authors
Sourceon education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 7 S. ZDB
related to:Drawing distinctions. What is post-critical pedagogy?
Post-critique, politics, and the political in educational philosophy
'Post-critiquiness' as nonviolent thing-centredness
Beyond ambiguity and ambivalence. Rethinking the tools of critique
Document  (314 KB)
License of the document Lizenz-Logo 
Keywords (German)
sub-discipline
Document typeArticle (journal)
ISSN2571-7855; 25717855
LanguageEnglish
Year of creation
review statusPublishing House Lectorship
Abstract (English):Critique has run out of steam - this diagnosis by Bruno Latour is crucial for the "Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy" as well as for the on_education issue "The Fatigue of Critique?". With this essay, the author contradicts Latour's diagnosis. Latour's polemic against critique is based firstly on a questionable diagnosis of our time and secondly on a general and programmatic critique of sociology. Against that, the author brings out two main points. The first insight highlights that change is initially dependent on variations that can only arise from a negation of the existing. The second insight comes from the sociology of critique, which paradoxically sees success in the failure of critique. (DIPF/Orig.)
other articles of this journal
Statistics
Checksums
Date of publication15.05.2024
CitationHaker, Christoph; Otterspeer, Lukas: Reply. Against Latour - on the questionable foundations of post-critical pedagogy - In: on education. Journal for research and debate 3 (2020) 9, 7 S. - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-298431 - DOI: 10.25656/01:29843
export files

share content at social platforms